Where should nudity be allowed?
In this #UndressedThread, we’re reflecting on the lines society draws—and redraws—around the naked body
This week brought news from multiple fronts: A court decision in Minnesota affirmed that toplessness isn’t inherently lewd. But at the same time, police and rangers in Seattle and Florida escalated enforcement against peaceful nudity in long-standing public spaces.
Clearly, society still doesn’t agree on where nudity belongs—or whether it belongs at all. But if the law can change, so can the culture.
In this #UndressedThread, we’re asking:
Where should nudity be protected—and what makes a space feel safe or appropriate?
Have you ever experienced public nudity that felt right, and wished it were more accepted?
How do we keep nudity from being pushed further to the margins?
Let’s talk about visibility, access, and the future of body freedom. 🪐
More #UndressedThreads
This #UndressedThread is brought to you by our Etsy store!
All kinds of fun stuff to brighten your life and support our work at the same time.
Simple nudity is inherently non-sexual and natural. There is zero reason for it to be banned anywhere. And I 100% disagree about children needing to be shielded from that. They are born nudists and have to be forced to wear clothes. There has never been a single child harmed in any way by the sight of another person without clothes. They are only harmed by the reaction of adults around them.
I wish we had a law like in England where nudity is allowed anywhere. Simply being nude in public is not considered lewd conduct.