Discussion about this post

User's avatar
JoeBianco's avatar

There's something deeply frustrating about how naturism talks a big game about connecting with nature, while failing to walk the walk when it comes to real environmental action. I've seen this firsthand at naturist clubs – these places have acres of land but can't be bothered to grow even a few tomatoes or herbs. Instead, what do you find? The same processed junk food you'd get anywhere else.

The irony hits hardest when you're sitting there watching someone wax poetic about being "one with nature" while cracking open their third can of Coke. It's clear that for many people, naturism has become just another lifestyle choice, stripped of any deeper ecological meaning.

The commercialization bugs me the most. These clubs could be showcasing how personal freedom and environmental consciousness go hand in hand. But no – they've taken the easy route, focusing on individual comfort while paying lip service to environmental values. The gap between what naturists preach about nature and what they actually practice suggests we're missing a huge opportunity to make this movement mean something more.

Expand full comment
Jean-Yves Dionne's avatar

Walking nude in any environment is enough to realize the close connexion we have (or should have) with it. Bare foot in the forest, one has to keep his attention on the soil, the environment, the branches, even the sun. On the other hand, clothed with high tech gear and hiking boot, the only sense left is the sight. When the environment is unhealthy, we sense it quickly when nude. Otherwise, the health of the environment is only an abstract, intellectual concept.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts