One more:

Amdt1.7.5.11 Obscenity

First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Although public discussion of political affairs is at the core of the First Amendment, the. . .


. . . U.S. 49, 73, 113 (1973) (Brennan, J., dissenting). But children do have First Amendment protection and government may not bar dissemination of everything to them. The Court stated: Speech that is neither obscene as to youths nor subject to some other legitimate proscription cannot be suppressed solely to protect the young from ideas or images that a legislative body thinks unsuitable for them. .

It’s not a great leap to bar legislatures from prohibiting a child from seeing something to which their parent had no objection, i.e human nudity.

I would ask one further question. Are Wisconsin farmers barred from allowing their minor children to view the mating of farm animals?

Expand full comment

If these bills go through the World's Naturist Community should blacklist Wisconsin.

Expand full comment