Whoever owns the park has the final say. Since the government owns the park, that's where the risk comes from. Often the government has no interest in the desires of the users unless those users become impossible to brush off.
As an occasional (nude) visitor to D-B Park, I applaud this move... although I am used to getting nude at my car in the parking lot and re-dressing in the parking lot, and being able to go nude anywhere on the grounds, having to have minimal coverage to go to the waterfront area may be a small price to pay to have official recognition of clothing-optional use.
Whoever owns the park has the final say. Since the government owns the park, that's where the risk comes from. Often the government has no interest in the desires of the users unless those users become impossible to brush off.
It is good to see some positive movement. It doesn't affect my area or situation, but I am always glad to hear of at least minor wins for nudism.
As an occasional (nude) visitor to D-B Park, I applaud this move... although I am used to getting nude at my car in the parking lot and re-dressing in the parking lot, and being able to go nude anywhere on the grounds, having to have minimal coverage to go to the waterfront area may be a small price to pay to have official recognition of clothing-optional use.