Discussion about this post

User's avatar
MystrD's avatar

The key takeaway here is narratives and the awareness that we have of them. Closely associated with narratives is the language that we use. Especially turns of phrase because they are mind shaping spells that get us thinking linearly without even realising it.

The insidious nature of spells is such, that one doesn’t even realise they’re under the power of a spell until something comes along to break it.

I find the term “nonsexual social nudity” personally triggering because it’s so specific and counter to the thrust of what you’re otherwise saying.

Being at one with nature, naked or otherwise, doesn’t need a social construct around it. Nudity itself should be as natural as any other activity and therefore not need a social construct around it.

Sex has been so demonised within society that people are terrified to stand in its defence. The reason “nonsexual nudity” is such an unnecessary term, is because it asserts and reinforces the idea that 1) the only kind of nudity is typically sexual in nature and 2) humans are typically nonsexual unless naked.

On this point it completely side steps the fact that humans are on the whole highly sexualised beings, whether clothed or not.

People are generally so brainwashed that sex is a terrible thing, that the need to suppress that aspect of our nature is compulsory.

An alternative to weird is exceptional. In a world full of mindless zombies under the spell of conformity, critical thought is a rare commodity.

Examine the language we individually use carefully and see if it doesn’t reveal a narrative that is in fact a spell we don’t even know that we’re under.

John's avatar

This is one of the very best articles I have ever read on the subject. It reaffirms my desire to stay weird and possibly even get weirder. Thank you!!!

10 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?