Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Zaftig Pink's avatar

I'm not a toy collector, but on the bookshelf by my desk for the past 25 years I've had a Feral Cheryl doll. She was created as an anti-barbie by a small company in Australia and now seems like a relic of happier times in the 90s. She had a more realistic figure within the bounds of toy manufacturing, body positive before that term was in widespread use. Hair styled in dreadlocks, nose ring, tattoos, and an impressive tuft of sewn-in pubic hair. Also came with a small bag of herbs in her purse from the days when that was a countercultural signifier. Again, a product of a very specific cultural moment, but did capture the more relaxed, slightly funky feel of that moment very well.

Expand full comment
Karl's avatar

Thanks for your post. I was recently surprised to find that my daughter’s LOL dolls are anatomically correct. Given the ubiquity and popularity of these dolls among young kids these days I thought that was a truly encouraging development. I guess the doll maker even made a statement about why the believed it was important to be accurate and to embrace all body types.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts