Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Au Naturel's avatar

This isn't just an Arkansas thing. I met a woman at Deep Creek who couldn't bring her almost adult children because it was a clothing optional place. It was part of a custody agreement and her ex-husband thought naturism was evil. The court thought it was reasonable. This is California, where there is no state law against nudity and the county didn't have one either.

I'm not sure why the Arkansas state law against even advocating for nudity wasn't challenged and overturned long ago. And now that SCOTUS is dominated by right wing ideologues, its too late.

Expand full comment
MarriedNudist94's avatar

As soon as I read the title to this article, I knew this would be an uphill, very unfair battle. Arkansas? The one state that very obviously has no clue what Naturism is about. It’s unfortunate that she’s learned the value and the benefits of pure innocent nudism while living there. And thinking it’s possible she’s not allowed to move, take her child with her of course, away from AR.

She’s done nothing wrong. Her Ex and the state are the ones who are wrong. 😢

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts